A New Framework Reveals Unintended Side Effects in AI Language Model Interventions

NYU Center for Data Science
3 min readDec 20, 2024

--

Even the most precise surgical changes to AI language models can have unexpected ripple effects, much like how a small stone dropped in a pond creates expanding waves far beyond its entry point.

CDS Faculty Fellow Shauli Ravfogel and his collaborators have developed a new mathematical framework that reveals how attempts to modify language models’ behavior — like reducing bias or improving truthfulness — often lead to unintended changes in seemingly unrelated areas. Their work introduces a rigorous way to generate and analyze counterfactual examples: examples that demonstrate how a given text would have appeared if it had been generated by a model after specific modifications.

The researchers focused on “interventions” — targeted modifications to language models intended to change specific behaviors. For example, a model might be tweaked to reduce gender bias in its outputs or to update factual knowledge like the location of a museum. While previous work showed these interventions could successfully change the targeted behavior, there was no systematic way to understand their broader impacts.

“Many interventions intended to be ‘minimal’ can still have considerable causal effect on the output of the model,” Ravfogel said. The researchers found that even interventions updating just a few parameters could dramatically alter how models complete neutral prompts.

To enable this analysis, the team reformulated language models as structural equation models (SEMs). By applying the Gumbel-max trick from probability theory, this framework separates the model’s deterministic computations from the randomness involved in generating text. This separation allows researchers to generate true counterfactuals — showing how a specific piece of text would have been different if the model had been modified in a particular way while keeping all other random factors constant.

The ability to generate these counterfactuals represents a significant advance in our understanding of language models. Previous work could only show how a modified model might generate new text from scratch, but couldn’t reveal how specific existing outputs would have changed. This is analogous to the difference between wondering “what would happen if we ran this experiment again under different conditions?” versus “what would have happened in this exact same experiment if we had changed one specific factor?”

In experiments with models like GPT2-XL and Llama, they found that common intervention techniques had significant unintended consequences. When they modified the model to change its “knowledge” of the location of the Louvre from Paris to Rome, for instance, the counterfactuals showed that the intervention often altered unrelated aspects of generated text beyond just the museum’s location. Many examples showed substantial changes in other content that should have remained the same.

Similarly, when they used interventions to change gender-related aspects of text generation, the counterfactuals revealed shifts that went well beyond simple pronoun changes. A piece of text mentioning “marketing, entrepreneurship, and management” transformed that segment into “early childhood education and child development,” showing how deeply these interventions can affect a model’s behavior.

These findings point to fundamental challenges in precisely controlling AI language models. Much like complex biological or economic systems, even small targeted changes can cascade in unexpected ways through these intricate networks of artificial neurons. The ability to generate counterfactuals provides a powerful new tool for understanding these effects.

The researchers hope their framework will help the field develop more surgical intervention techniques — ones that can modify specific model behaviors while minimally impacting other capabilities. This could be crucial as language models become increasingly integrated into real-world applications where reliable, predictable behavior is essential.

The research was conducted while Ravfogel was transitioning from his PhD at ETH Zurich to his current role at CDS. His co-authors included collaborators at ETH Zurich and the University of Copenhagen.

By Stephen Thomas

--

--

NYU Center for Data Science
NYU Center for Data Science

Written by NYU Center for Data Science

Official account of the Center for Data Science at NYU, home of the Undergraduate, Master’s, and Ph.D. programs in Data Science.

No responses yet